OWC 8GB DDR4-2400
OWC
25 综合评分
vs
Kingston Fury Beast 16GB DDR5-6000 CL36
Kingston
66 综合评分
买家怎么说
OWC 8GB DDR4-2400
暂无用户反馈
Kingston Fury Beast 16GB DDR5-6000 CL36
85 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
金士顿 Fury Beast RGB 32GB DDR5-6000 内存套件因其在游戏和内容创作中带来的显著性能提升以及易于安装而受到好评。用户赞赏其生动的RGB灯效以及与 AMD EXPO 和 Intel XMP 的兼容性。少数问题被提及，例如补货费用和因 Windows 11 内存消耗而需要两根16GB内存条。总的来说，它被视为一种可靠且视觉上吸引人的升级，有助于系统未来防護。
优点
- 出色的游戏和内容创作性能
- 生动且同步的RGB灯效
- 安装简便
- 兼容 AMD EXPO 和 Intel XMP
- 折扣时性价比高
缺点
- 退款时可能产生补货费
- 可能需要两根内存条才能获得Windows 11最佳性能
- 不是市场上最便宜的选择
Performance 7
Easiness installation 3
Rgb lighting 2
Compatibility 3
Value for money 3
Refund policy 1
评分
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
规格
| OWC 8GB | Kingston Fury Beast | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 260 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 17★ | 36 |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | — |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
OWC 8GB DDR4-2400
- Strong affordability (75th percentile)
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average speed (29th percentile)
Kingston Fury Beast 16GB DDR5-6000 CL36
- Strong speed (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong latency (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Strong feature (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (32nd percentile)
结论
胜出: Kingston Fury Beast
Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 14 specs.