Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
Fujifilm
76 综合评分
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
72 满分 100 置信度中 14 条评价
富士XF 24mm f/2.8镜头因其紧凑的尺寸、轻巧的重量和出色的图像质量而广受赞誉，尤其适合旅行和户外摄影。用户强调其锐度、微对比度和防风雨密封性，尽管一些人注意到在最大光圈下画质偏软，室内表现一般。一些评论者认为它不如更亮或更广的替代品令人印象深刻，但总体而言，它被认为是一款多功能且便携的定焦镜头。
优点
- 紧凑轻巧的设计
- 出色的锐度和微对比度
- 非常适合旅行和户外摄影
- 防风雨密封结构
- 快速准确的自动对焦
缺点
- 大光圈下画质偏软
- 室内表现一般
- 缺少手动对焦开关
- 虚化不如f/1.4版本
- 有些人认为不如替代品锐利
Image quality 6
Portability 5
Build quality 4
Sharpness 5
Aperture performance 4
Autofocus 2
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
82 满分 100 置信度高 117 条评价
索尼E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS镜头被广泛称赞为APS-C E卡口相机出色的全能旅行和日常挂机镜头。用户一致强调其锐度、紧凑尺寸、轻巧重量以及多功能的27-200mm等效变焦范围。虽然有人指出在18mm端存在明显暗角以及弱光性能有限，但整体情绪非常积极，许多人认为它是套机镜头的绝佳升级。
优点
- 图像清晰锐利
- 紧凑轻巧
- 多功能的27-200mm等效变焦范围
- 有效的光学防抖
- 快速准确的自动对焦
缺点
- 18mm广角端有明显暗角
- 不适合弱光摄影
- 可变光圈限制了长焦端的亮度
- 部分个体可能存在品控问题
- 与高端镜头相比自动对焦略有延迟
Image quality 35
Build quality 12
Value for money 18
Vignetting 6
Low light performance 10
Zoom range 25
评分
Budget
Street
Macro
Portrait
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
规格
| Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 16 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 16 |
| Groups | 8 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | Super EBC multi-layer coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.15 kg★ | 0.33 kg |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 16 mm★ | 450 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:7.7★ | 0.29x |
优缺点
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
价格
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm0.123每美元得分
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.097每美元得分
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/2.8 R WR 16mm 性价比高 1.3 倍
结论
胜出: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.
