Philips SHP9500/00

Philips SHP9500/00

Philips
55 综合评分
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
88 综合评分

买家怎么说

Philips SHP9500/00

88 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价

Philips SHP9500 开放式耳机因其卓越的性价比而广受赞誉,以实惠的价格提供发烧级音质。评论者强调其清晰细腻的中高频、令人印象深刻的声场以及长时间聆听的出色舒适度。低音紧实准确,但可能无法满足低音爱好者,开放式设计导致声音泄漏严重,不适合公共场合使用。做工质量对得起价格,但有些人指出塑料结构感觉不够高级。

优点
  • 卓越的性价比
  • 清晰细腻的中高频
  • 令人印象深刻的声场
  • 长时间佩戴非常舒适
  • 轻量化设计
缺点
  • 声音泄漏严重
  • 低音对低音爱好者来说较弱
  • 塑料结构感觉廉价
  • 不附带收纳袋
  • 夹持力弱,不适合活动使用
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Sound quality 7
👍 Comfort 6
🤔 Bass performance 5
🤔 Build quality 4
👎 Sound leakage 4

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

暂无用户反馈

评分

Budget
Philips
64
Beyerdynamic
87
Commute
Philips
28
Beyerdynamic
85
Music
Philips
55
Beyerdynamic
83
Studio
Philips
64
Beyerdynamic
83
Gaming
Philips
36
Beyerdynamic
81
Work
Philips
23
Beyerdynamic
79
Calls
Philips
17
Beyerdynamic
69

规格

Philips SHP9500/00Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Open/Closedopenclosed
Foldable✗✓★
Weight0.30 kg0.22 kg★
Ear Cushionbreathable ear cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandsteelaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typeneodymiumdynamic
Driver Size50 mm★45 mm
Drivers—1★
Freq Min12 Hz★20 Hz
Freq Max35 kHz★22 kHz
Impedance32 Ω48 Ω
Sensitivity101 dB★—
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
Codecs—AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC✗✓★
ANC Type—Adaptive
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✗✓★
Bluetooth—5.4★
Profiles—AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint—✓★
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable✓✓
Cable Length1.5 m—
Range—15 m★
Battery
Battery Life—60 hrs★
Charge Time—1.5 hrs★
Fast Charging—15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time
Charging—USB-C★
Capacity—630 mAh★
Microphone
Microphone✗✓★
Mic Count—2★
NC Mic—✓★
Boom Mic—✗
Detachable Mic—✗
Features
Voice Assistant—Google Fast Pair
Touch Controls—✗
App—beyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode—✗

优缺点

Philips SHP9500/00

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong sound (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average comfort (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile

价格

Philips SHP9500/00 is €91 cheaper (1.8x less).

Philips SHP9500/000.515每美元得分
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.443每美元得分

Philips SHP9500/00 性价比高 1.2 倍

Philips SHP9500/00

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

结论

★ 胜出: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 41 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 更擅长:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

也值得考虑