Sennheiser RS 175
Sennheiser
31 综合评分
vs
Anker Soundcore Space D1402
Anker
87 综合评分
买家怎么说
Sennheiser RS 175
72 满分 100 置信度高 203 条评价
Sennheiser RS 175 无线耳机在音质、舒适度和看电视的便利性方面普遍获得好评，特别是对于有听力障碍或不想打扰他人的人。许多用户喜欢低音增强、环绕模式和简单设置，但一些用户报告了信号范围问题、间歇性中断以及偶尔的充电或连接问题。有些人觉得它们不舒服或不值全价，而另一些人则称赞它们在促销时的价值。
优点
- 清晰细腻的声音
- 长时间佩戴舒适
- 易于设置和使用
- 低音增强和环绕模式
- 看电视不打扰他人
缺点
- 远距离信号丢失
- 间歇性音频中断
- 充电连接问题
- 对某些人不舒服
- 不值全价
Sound quality 45
Comfort 28
Signal range 18
Ease of setup 22
Value for money 20
Charging issues 12
Anker Soundcore Space D1402
88 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
Soundcore Space 2 耳机以其卓越的舒适性、长电池续航和价格下强大的降噪功能给用户留下了深刻印象。虽然默认音效可能需要通过应用调整，但整体音质、做工以及多点连接和LDAC等功能使其物超所值。小缺点包括长时间佩戴发热和缺乏防水性。
优点
- 卓越的舒适性
- 长电池续航
- 强大的降噪
- 物超所值
- 通过应用可自定义EQ
缺点
- 默认音效需要调整
- 长时间佩戴发热
- 不防水
- 3D音频模式华而不实
Comfort 5
Battery life 4
Noise cancellation 5
Sound quality 5
Value for money 4
App experience 4
评分
Commute
Budget
Work
Gaming
Studio
Music
Calls
规格
| Sennheiser RS 175 | Anker Soundcore Space D1402 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.31 kg | 0.27 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | protein leather |
| Headband | — | memory foam with a soft leather finish |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 17 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Sennheiser RS 175 RF Wireless Headphones for TV with Bass Boost and Surround Sound Modes, Compact and Ergonomic, Wireless TV Headphones Listening, Black | SBC, AAC, LDAC |
| Surround | Surround Sound | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Range | 100 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 18 hrs | 50 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 5 min for 4 hours playback |
| Charging | proprietary | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 3★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | Soundcore |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
优缺点
Sennheiser RS 175
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Strong anc (74th percentile)
- Below average comfort (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average affordability (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average sound (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average battery (19th percentile)19th %ile
Anker Soundcore Space D1402
- Strong anc (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong sound (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average affordability (33rd percentile)
价格
Sennheiser RS 1750.130每美元得分
vs
Anker Soundcore Space D14020.725每美元得分
Anker Soundcore Space D1402 性价比高 5.6 倍
结论
胜出: Anker Soundcore Space D1402
Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 38 specs.
