Marshall Monitor III A.N.C.
Marshall
79 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-A800
Technics
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Marshall Monitor III A.N.C.
92 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
Marshall Monitor III 耳机因其出色的音质、舒适度和电池续航而获得压倒性的正面反馈。用户称赞其清晰细腻的音频、宽广的声场和有效的噪音消除，并经常将其与更昂贵的品牌进行有利比较。轻量级设计和柔软的耳垫使其长时间佩戴舒适，尽管有些人觉得它们有点大。一个小缺点是耳垫在温暖天气下会导致出汗，并且自动暂停功能有轻微延迟。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 有效的噪音消除
- 长电池续航（70小时）
- 舒适的耳垫
- 轻量级设计
缺点
- 耳垫在温暖天气下会导致出汗
- 自动暂停功能有轻微延迟
- 对于某些头型来说有点大
Sound quality 5
Noise cancellation 3
Battery life 2
Comfort 4
Build quality 3
Value for money 2
Technics EAH-A800
82 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Technics EAH-A800 耳机因其卓越的音质而获得压倒性的积极反馈，许多用户将其与有线耳机相媲美，尤其是在使用 LDAC 编解码器时。评论者称赞其佩戴舒适、主动降噪效果出色，以及能够营造出具有清晰立体声分离度的沉浸式声场。然而，少数用户报告了耐用性问题，例如头梁材料在一个月内松动以及一年后出现故障组件，而其他用户则建议进行小幅改进，例如更大的耳罩和更多的均衡器频段。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的主动降噪
- 佩戴舒适
- 沉浸式声场和立体声分离
- 支持 LDAC 编解码器，实现高品质音频
缺点
- 头梁材料的耐用性问题
- 一年后出现故障组件
- 耳罩可以稍大一些
- 头梁在头皮上感觉有点硬
- 只有 5 个均衡器频段（希望更多）
Sound quality 7
Build quality 2
Comfort 3
Anc performance 2
Ldac codec 3
Eq customization 2
评分
Gaming
Work
Calls
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
规格
| Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. | Technics EAH-A800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.25 kg★ | 0.30 kg |
| Ear Cushion | — | super-soft earpads |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 32 mm | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 4 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 46 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 91.69999694824219 dB | 105 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Wireless Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones - Active Noise Cancelling with Microphone | 100+ Hr Playtime | Lightweight, Foldable Design for Travel - Cream | AAC, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | Spatial Audio | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones with 2 Device Multipoint Connectivity - EAH-A800-K Black | Technics - Wireless Noise Cancelling Over-Ear | Technics | Black | Over Ear | Over E |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | three levels of noise cancellation, low, mid and high | Dual Hybrid |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.2 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | — | 1 m |
| Range | 10.100000381469727 m | 10.100000381469727 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 100 hrs★ | 50 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | 3 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 15 minutes gives 12 hours of playtime | 15 Minutes for 10 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Voice assistant | Siri, Alexa |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | Marshall Bluetooth app | Technics Audio Connect |
优缺点
Marshall Monitor III A.N.C.
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong anc (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
Technics EAH-A800
- Strong mic (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (95th percentile)95th %ile
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-A800
Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 37 specs.