Zildjian ALCHEM-E ZXHP0022
Zildjian
63 综合评分
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002
Bang & Olufsen
78 综合评分
买家怎么说
Zildjian ALCHEM-E ZXHP0022
82 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
Zildjian ALCHEM-E 耳机因其卓越的音质、坚固的构造和有效的降噪功能而备受赞誉。用户欣赏个性化的听力调整和长电池续航，但有些人认为夹紧力对于大头来说太强，耳罩略小。独特的设计和响应迅速的客户服务也被强调为主要优点。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 有效的降噪
- 个性化听力调整
- 长电池续航
- 优质做工
缺点
- 大头夹力强
- 耳罩开口小
- 移动时有闭塞效应
- 金色旋钮设计俗气
- 无透明模式
Sound quality 8
Build quality 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 4
Design 5
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002
85 满分 100 置信度低 9 条评价
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 耳机因其卓越的音质、优质材料和出色的舒适度而获得压倒性的积极反馈。用户称赞其自然、平衡的声音特性和有效的降噪功能，尽管有些人注意到价格较高和轻微的连接问题。一些评论将其与 Sennheiser Momentum 4 和 Focal 等竞争对手进行有利比较，强调其卓越的制造工艺和声音中性。
优点
- 卓越的音质
- 优质材料和做工
- 长时间佩戴的出色舒适度
- 有效的降噪功能
- 长电池续航
缺点
- 价格高昂
- 没有D/A转换器
- 对某些人来说中频不足
- 与Windows音量控制的连接问题
- 默认声音模式最初不吸引人
Sound quality 8
Build quality 6
Comfort 5
Noise cancellation 5
Battery life 4
Value for money 4
评分
Budget
Work
Gaming
Music
Commute
Calls
Studio
规格
| Zildjian ALCHEM-E ZXHP0022 | Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.37 kg | 0.28 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | leatherette | memory foam |
| Headband | — | aluminium |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 7 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 4700 Ω | 24 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 94 dB | 95 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, aptX Adaptive, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | 2 Levels of Active Noise Canceling | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.1 |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP | — |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Cable Length | 1.7999999523162842 m | 1.2000000476837158 m |
| Range | 15 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 45 hrs★ | 40 hrs |
| Charge Time | — | 3 hrs★ |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | 680 mAh | 1,200 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 1 | 4★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | Zildjian | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | — | IP53 |
优缺点
Zildjian ALCHEM-E ZXHP0022
- Strong connectivity (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong sound (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong anc (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong battery (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average comfort (15th percentile)15th %ile
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong connectivity (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average build (35th percentile)
价格
Zildjian ALCHEM-E ZXHP00220.182每美元得分
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 12240020.131每美元得分
Zildjian ALCHEM-E ZXHP0022 性价比高 1.4 倍
结论
胜出: Bang & Olufsen Beoplay HX 1224002
Scores 78 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 40 specs.
