Intel Pentium T7700 2-core LGA 775
Intel
35 综合评分
vs
Dell Xeon E5620 4-core LGA 1366
Dell
22 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Pentium T7700 2-core LGA 775
92 满分 100 置信度中 11 条评价
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 处理器作为老旧笔记本电脑廉价且有效的升级选择广受好评，为旧机器注入了新的活力。用户一致报告了显著的性能提升、简单的安装过程和可靠的运行。少数缺点包括需要导热膏以及一个案例中的配送延迟，但总体满意度极高。
优点
- 廉价且有效的升级
- 显著的性能提升
- 简单安装
- 延长笔记本电脑使用寿命
- 兼容许多旧笔记本电脑
缺点
- 需要导热膏
- 某些情况下的配送延迟
Performance improvement 8
Value for money 5
Ease of installation 6
Laptop compatibility 4
Delivery speed 3
Thermal paste requirement 2
Dell Xeon E5620 4-core LGA 1366
暂无用户反馈
评分
Budget
Productivity
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Server
规格
| Intel Pentium T7700 | Dell Xeon E5620 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Core 2 Duo | Xeon |
| Model | T7700 | E5620 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake | — |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | 14★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 2 | 4★ |
| P-cores | 4★ | — |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 4★ | 1 |
| L3 Cache | 8 | 12★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4★ | — |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Max Memory | 64★ | — |
| ECC | ✗ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 775 | LGA 1366 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16★ | — |
| TDP | 65★ | 80 |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | HD 630 | — |
优缺点
Intel Pentium T7700 2-core LGA 775
- Strong user sentiment (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average single thread (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average multi thread (24th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (27th percentile)
Dell Xeon E5620 4-core LGA 1366
- Strong affordability (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average single thread (23rd percentile)
- Below average ai (30th percentile)
价格
Intel Pentium T7700 2-core LGA 775
Dell Xeon E5620 4-core LGA 1366
No current pricing available
结论
胜出: Intel Pentium T7700
Scores 35 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 25 specs.
