AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-core AM5
AMD
100 综合评分
vs
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700
Intel
48 综合评分
买家怎么说
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-core AM5
88 满分 100 置信度高 38 条评价
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 作为顶级游戏和生产力 CPU 获得了压倒性的好评。用户强调其相比旧系统巨大的性能提升、流畅的 4K 游戏体验以及出色的多任务处理能力。虽然有人指出 7800X3D 在纯游戏方面可能略胜一筹，但 7950X3D 的额外核心使其成为全能型选择。也有人对不附带散热器和需要高端散热解决方案表示了一些担忧。
优点
- 性能极速
- 游戏和生产力俱佳
- 流畅的4K游戏体验
- 出色的多任务处理能力
- 安装简便
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 需要高端散热解决方案
- 需要AM5主板和DDR5内存
- 纯游戏方面7800X3D可能更好
Gaming performance 8
Productivity performance 6
Value for money 5
Cooling requirements 4
Platform compatibility 4
Ease of installation 3
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700
55 满分 100 置信度低 6 条评价
唯一的一条评论将Intel Celeron G6900描述为一款预算处理器，能够很好地处理基本的Windows任务，如文字处理，但指出其在更苛刻用途上的局限性。问答部分澄清了它附带散热风扇，需要LGA 1700插槽，支持DDR4和DDR5内存，并具有适合基本任务的集成显卡。总体情绪略偏正面，重点关注性价比。
优点
- 价格实惠
- 足以处理基本任务
- 附带散热风扇
- 支持DDR4和DDR5
缺点
- 对高要求任务有限
- 仅基本性能
Value for money 1
Performance 1
Cooling solution 1
Memory support 1
Integrated graphics 1
评分
Productivity
Gaming
Ai Llm
Budget
Efficiency
Server
规格
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Intel Celeron G6900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | Ryzen 9 | Celeron |
| Model | 7950X3D | G6900 |
| Codename | Zen 4 | Alder Lake |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 5★ | 7 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 16★ | 2 |
| P-cores | 16★ | 2 |
| Threads | 32★ | 2 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 16★ | 2.5 |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 24★ | 20 |
| TDP | 120 | 46★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 46★ |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
优缺点
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-core AM5
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average affordability (14th percentile)14th %ile
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700
- Strong affordability (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong platform (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong single thread (76th percentile)
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (19th percentile)19th %ile
价格
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-core AM50.132每美元得分
vs
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA17000.558每美元得分
Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700 性价比高 4.2 倍
结论
胜出: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 27 specs.