SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Общая оценка
vs
Lexar NQ780 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Lexar NQ780 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Lexar
73 Общая оценка

Оценки

Console
SanDisk
86
Lexar
71
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Lexar
67
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Lexar
72
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Lexar
78
Budget
SanDisk
57
Lexar
73
Portable
SanDisk
23
Lexar
19

Характеристики

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Lexar NQ780
Drive
Capacity
8,000
2,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
6,500
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
7,400
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
1,000,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
900,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Нет данных
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Нет данных
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★✗
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Плюсы и минусы

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Lexar NQ780 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong speed (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong capacity (79th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (28th percentile)

Вердикт

★ Победитель: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Лучше в:

GamingConsolePortableWorkstation

Lexar NQ780 Лучше в:

BudgetLaptop