Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025
Xiaomi
78 Pontuação geral
vs
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Black
ICONLINK
47 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Entertainment
Art Design
Reading
Productivity
Student
Business
Especificações
| Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 | ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 3 GHz | — |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB★ | 4 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB★ | 128 GB |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11.2" | 10.1" |
| Resolution | 3200 px★ | — |
| Panel | LCD | IPS★ |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | 800 nits★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | — |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Cellular | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓★ | — |
| Fingerprint Reader | ✓★ | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | — |
| OS | HyperOS 2 | Android 16 |
Prós e Contras
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong gpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong storage (90th percentile)90th %ile
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Black
- Strong cpu (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong gpu (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
- Strong battery (66th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average ram (32nd percentile)
- Below average feature (34th percentile)
Preços
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 20250.135pontos por dólar
vs
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Black0.341pontos por dólar
ICONLINK 10.1" CP31M Black oferece 2.5x melhor custo-benefício
Veredito
Vencedor: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779
Scores 78 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.
