SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 종합 점수
vs
Samsung PM9C1a 256GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Samsung
42 종합 점수
점수
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
사양
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Samsung PM9C1a | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 데이터 없음 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 데이터 없음 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | — |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | 데이터 없음 | |
| MTBF (hours) | 데이터 없음 | |
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | — |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
장단점
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
Samsung PM9C1a 256GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong speed (77th percentile)
- Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average social proof (26th percentile)
결론
승자: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.