Micron (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
Micron
67 종합 점수
vs
Timetec 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3L-1600 CL11 SODIMM (MR-H8GD316S7D-NA)
Timetec
41 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
사양
| Micron | Timetec 16GB DDR3L SODIMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4★ | DDR3L |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 204 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 22 | 11★ |
| Timings | 22-22-22 | — |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | — |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | — |
장단점
Micron (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Strong feature (65th percentile)
Timetec 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3L-1600 CL11 SODIMM (MR-H8GD316S7D-NA)
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong affordability (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
가격
Micron (CT2K32G4DFD832A)0.101달러당 점수
vs
Timetec 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3L-1600 CL11 SODIMM (MR-H8GD316S7D-NA)0.681달러당 점수
Timetec 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3L-1600 CL11 SODIMM (MR-H8GD316S7D-NA) 6.7배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Micron
Scores 67 overall, wins 3 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
