Team Group CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01
Team Group
84 종합 점수
vs
Kingston FURY Beast
Kingston
58 종합 점수
점수
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
사양
| Team Group CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01 | Kingston FURY Beast | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32★ | 36 |
| Timings | 32-39-39-84 | — |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Team Group CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
Kingston FURY Beast
- Strong speed (78th percentile)
- Strong latency (71st percentile)
- Strong feature (66th percentile)
- Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
가격
Team Group CTCED532G6400HC32ADC010.173달러당 점수
vs
Kingston FURY Beast0.347달러당 점수
Kingston FURY Beast 2.0배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Team Group CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01
Scores 84 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.
