Kingston FURY Beast
Kingston
91 종합 점수
vs
Corsair (CMH32GX4M2E3200C16)
Corsair
78 종합 점수
점수
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Server
사양
| Kingston FURY Beast | Corsair | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 2 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 30 | 16★ |
| Timings | 30-36-36 | 16-20-20-38 |
| Voltage | 1.399999976158142 | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
장단점
Kingston FURY Beast
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
Corsair (CMH32GX4M2E3200C16)
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
가격
Kingston FURY Beast0.060달러당 점수
vs
Corsair (CMH32GX4M2E3200C16)0.225달러당 점수
Corsair (CMH32GX4M2E3200C16) 3.8배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Kingston FURY Beast
Scores 91 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
