Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
73 종합 점수
vs
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
Tamron
93 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Macro
Travel
Street
Portrait
Professional
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
사양
| Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 19 |
| Groups | 10 | 5 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 4 | 4 |
| Coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 3.5-6.3 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.62 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | VXD |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 150 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:2★ |
장단점
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
- Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong macro (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
가격
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B00.380달러당 점수
vs
Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD0.147달러당 점수
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 2.6배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Tamron Di III 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
Scores 93 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.
