Glorto
Glorto
15 종합 점수
vs
Kelinx
Kelinx
40 종합 점수
점수
Workstation
Content Creation
Budget
Ray Tracing
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 1440p
Ai Llm
Gaming 4k
사양
| Glorto | Kelinx | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Radeon HD 5450 | Radeon RX 580 |
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | — | Arctic Islands |
| Class | consumer | consumer |
| Process | 40 | 14★ |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 1 GB | 8 GB★ |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5★ |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | 데이터 없음 | |
| Compute | ||
| CUDA Cores | 데이터 없음 | |
| Stream Processors | 데이터 없음 | |
| RT Cores | — | 54★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | — | 55.29999923706055★ |
| FP32 TFLOPS | — | 27.649999618530273★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | 데이터 없음 | |
| GPU Compute | 데이터 없음 | |
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | — | 185★ |
| Recommended PSU | — | 450★ |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Cooler | Passive | Dual Fan★ |
| Fans | 0 | 2★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 2.0 x16 | PCI Express 3.0 x16 |
| DisplayPort | 0 | 2★ |
| HDMI | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 0★ | — |
| Max Displays | — | 2★ |
| Max Resolution | 2560x1600 | 5120 x 2880 |
| Physical | ||
| Slot Width | — | 2★ |
| Form Factor | Low Profile | Full Height |
| Weight | 0.27 kg★ | 0.93 kg |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✗ | — |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
장단점
Glorto
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average vram (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average rt (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average efficiency (6th percentile)6th %ile
Kelinx
- Strong compute (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (21st percentile)
- Below average raster (23rd percentile)
- Below average vram (27th percentile)
가격
Glorto0.185달러당 점수
vs
Kelinx0.248달러당 점수
Kelinx 1.3배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Kelinx
Scores 40 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 20 of 34 specs.
