Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
Fujifilm
18 종합 점수
vs
FLATIC CDR2H
FLATIC
43 종합 점수
점수
Product Photography
Youtube
Beginner
Video
Photography
Vlogging
Streaming
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Travel
사양
| Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 | FLATIC CDR2H | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/1.7-inch | 1/3-inch |
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 64 MP★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| Eye AF | ✗ | — |
| Animal AF | ✗ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✗ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Electronic Shutter | ✗ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 5K |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| Articulating | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.20 kg★ | 0.78 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | — |
| USB | — | Type-C |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | — |
장단점
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average sensor (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
FLATIC CDR2H
- Strong sensor (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong video (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Strong display (68th percentile)
- Below average burst (32nd percentile)
- Below average stabilization (34th percentile)
가격
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
FLATIC CDR2H
No current pricing available
결론
승자: FLATIC CDR2H
Scores 43 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
