SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 総合スコア
vs
BIWIN NV7400 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2

BIWIN NV7400 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2

BIWIN
69 総合スコア

スコア

Budget
SanDisk
57
BIWIN
89
Console
SanDisk
85
BIWIN
75
Workstation
SanDisk
85
BIWIN
61
Gaming
SanDisk
84
BIWIN
72
Laptop
SanDisk
65
BIWIN
64
Portable
SanDisk
23
BIWIN
20

スペック

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100BIWIN NV7400
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
7,450
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
6,500
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
1,000,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
900,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
データなし
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
データなし
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption✓★—

長所と短所

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

BIWIN NV7400 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2

  • Strong random (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong speed (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile

結論

★ 勝者: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 優れている点:

GamingConsolePortableWorkstation

BIWIN NV7400 優れている点:

Budget