Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Tamron
100 総合スコア
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
82 総合スコア
スコア
Budget
Macro
Street
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Travel
スペック
| Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD | Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 20 | 9 |
| Groups | 13 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 2 |
| Coating | fluorine coating | Nano-GI coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | 4-7.1 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.59 kg | 0.13 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | VXD linear motor★ | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 350 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:3.8 | 1:7 |
長所と短所
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
価格
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.123ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm0.185ドルあたりのスコア
Fujifilm XF 35mm F/2 R WR 35mm 1.5倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
