Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Crucial
69 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Kingston KSM24RS8/8HDI
Kingston
40 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Server
Laptop
Specifiche
| Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A | Kingston KSM24RS8/8HDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | DIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 22 | 17★ |
| Timings | 22-22-22 | — |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158 | 1.2000000476837158 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✓★ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | — |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | — |
Pro e Contro
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
Kingston KSM24RS8/8HDI
- Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average speed (29th percentile)
Prezzi
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A0.103punteggio per dollaro
vs
Kingston KSM24RS8/8HDI0.129punteggio per dollaro
Kingston KSM24RS8/8HDI offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.3x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Scores 69 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
