Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Sigma Contemporary 65mm f/2 DG 65mm

Sigma Contemporary 65mm f/2 DG 65mm

Sigma
48 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Macro
Canon
91
Sigma
52
Landscape
Canon
83
Sigma
51
Video Cinema
Canon
83
Sigma
46
Professional
Canon
82
Sigma
57
Travel
Canon
82
Sigma
48
Budget
Canon
80
Sigma
47
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Sigma
48
Street
Canon
68
Sigma
48
Portrait
Canon
53
Sigma
44

Specifiche

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMSigma Contemporary 65mm f/2 DG 65mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm65 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm65 mm
Elements1512
Groups129
Aspherical Elements22
ED Elements21
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)Super Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountCanon RFL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.49 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance239 mm550 mm
Max Magnification1:4.21:6.67

Pro e Contro

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 65mm f/2 DG 65mm

  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Strong optical (74th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Prezzi

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

No current pricing available

Sigma Contemporary 65mm f/2 DG 65mm

Verdetto

Vincitore: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche