Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
91 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

Carl Zeiss
43 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Travel
Sony
99
Carl Zeiss
31
Budget
Sony
91
Carl Zeiss
47
Street
Sony
90
Carl Zeiss
47
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Carl Zeiss
39
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Carl Zeiss
34
Landscape
Sony
79
Carl Zeiss
23
Portrait
Sony
77
Carl Zeiss
51
Professional
Sony
77
Carl Zeiss
34
Macro
Sony
68
Carl Zeiss
20

Specifiche

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCarl Zeiss 000000-2136-691
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm18 mm
Elements9—
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5—
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountSony E—
FormatAPS-C★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.33 kg
Filter Thread41 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★—
Max Magnification0.215x★—

Pro e Contro

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

  • Strong aperture (65th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Prezzi

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is 1.291 € cheaper (7.2x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.434punteggio per dollaro
vs
Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-6910.029punteggio per dollaro

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 15.0x migliore

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Carl Zeiss 000000-2136-691

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Da considerare anche