Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

Fujifilm
75 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Professional
Fujifilm
80
Nikon
95
Portrait
Fujifilm
60
Nikon
89
Street
Fujifilm
70
Nikon
86
Budget
Fujifilm
66
Nikon
86
Macro
Fujifilm
72
Nikon
85
Landscape
Fujifilm
64
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
75
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
70
Nikon
78
Travel
Fujifilm
60
Nikon
75

Specifiche

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min33 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max33 mm28 mm
Elements1513
Groups1011
Aspherical Elements23
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-CoatedMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.36 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motorStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:6.671:5.26

Pro e Contro

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdetto

Vincitore: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports