Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
28 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Professional
Sigma
98
Nikon
35
Portrait
Sigma
90
Nikon
50
Street
Sigma
88
Nikon
39
Budget
Sigma
85
Nikon
47
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Nikon
40
Macro
Sigma
83
Nikon
12
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Nikon
33
Landscape
Sigma
77
Nikon
27
Travel
Sigma
75
Nikon
33

Specifiche

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmNikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm120 mm
Elements16
Groups11
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ENikon F
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.57 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Pro e Contro

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Verdetto

Vincitore: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Migliore per:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports