Crucial CT16G4SFD832A
Crucial
53 Score global
vs
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32
Corsair
95 Score global
Scores
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Server
Spécifications
| Crucial CT16G4SFD832A | Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 260 | 288 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 22★ | 32 |
| Timings | 22-22-22 | 32-40-40-84 |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.399999976158142 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Crucial CT16G4SFD832A
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
Prix
Crucial CT16G4SFD832A0.141score par dollar
vs
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C320.077score par dollar
Crucial CT16G4SFD832A offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.8x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.
