Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
Corsair
95 Score global
vs
Timetec 76TT16
Timetec
46 Score global
Scores
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Server
Spécifications
| Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W | Timetec 76TT16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR3L |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2 | 4★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 204 |
| Rank | — | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32 | 11★ |
| Timings | 32-40-40-84 | — |
| Voltage | 1.399999976158142 | 1.350000023841858★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✓★ | — |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
Timetec 76TT16
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
Prix
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W0.093score par dollar
vs
Timetec 76TT160.516score par dollar
Timetec 76TT16 offre un rapport qualité-prix 5.5x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32W
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
