Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm
Canon
63 Score global
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Score global
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spécifications
| Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 500 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 20 | 13 |
| Groups | 14 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 7★ | 3 |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/54 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 4.5-7.1 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.36 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Dual Nano USM★ | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 900 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.33x | 1:5.26★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm
- Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average aperture (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.