Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
Lenovo
25 Score global
vs
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black
ASRock
55 Score global
Ce que disent les acheteurs
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
Pas encore de retours clients
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black
82 sur 100 confiance moyenne 18 avis
La ASRock RX 7600 Challenger 8GB est bien accueillie pour ses performances solides en 1080p, sa bonne gestion thermique et son logiciel RGB facile. Les utilisateurs apprécient son rapport qualité-prix pour les configurations économiques, bien que certains notent que les 8 Go de VRAM et le ray tracing sont limitants pour les résolutions supérieures. Quelques-uns mentionnent une instabilité des pilotes et un manque de support de la part d'ASRock.
Points forts
- Performances solides en 1080p
- Bonnes températures en charge
- Logiciel RGB facile
- Bon rapport qualité-prix
- Économe en énergie
Points faibles
- 8 Go de VRAM limitant en 1440p
- Performances de ray tracing médiocres
- Instabilité des pilotes après mises à jour
- Manque de support ASRock
Performance 1080p 6
Value for money 5
Thermals 4
Build quality 3
Rgb software 3
Vram limitation 3
Scores
Budget
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 1440p
Ray Tracing
Content Creation
Workstation
Gaming 4k
Ai Llm
Spécifications
| Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 | ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Quadro NVS 510 | Radeon RX 7600 |
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3 |
| Class | workstation | consumer |
| Process | 5★ | 6 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 2 GB | 8 GB★ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| Stream Processors | Pas de données | |
| Tensor Cores | — | 64★ |
| RT Cores | 54★ | 32 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 55.29999923706055★ | 43.5 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 27.649999618530273★ | 21.75 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 35★ | 165 |
| Recommended PSU | 450★ | 550 |
| Power Connectors | — | 8-Pin |
| Cooler | Fan | Dual Fan★ |
| Fans | — | 2★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | — | PCI Express 4.0 x8 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 3★ |
| HDMI | — | 1★ |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
| Max Resolution | — | 7680 x 4320 |
| Physical | ||
| Length | — | 269★ |
| Slot Width | — | 2★ |
| Form Factor | Low Profile | ATX |
| Weight | 0.10 kg★ | 0.64 kg |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✗ | ✓★ |
| AV1 Encode | — | ✓★ |
| DirectX | — | 12 Ultimate |
| RGB | — | ✓★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Strong compute (66th percentile)
- Below average raster (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average vram (16th percentile)16th %ile
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong affordability (75th percentile)
- Strong connectivity (71st percentile)
Prix
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation0.242score par dollar
vs
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6 Black0.116score par dollar
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.1x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger
Scores 55 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 36 specs.
