Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025
Xiaomi
79 Overall Score
vs
CFVOCUY 10.1" TS01-K103A 2026
CFVOCUY
43 Overall Score
Scores
Entertainment
Art Design
Reading
Productivity
Student
Business
Specifications
| Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 | CFVOCUY 10.1" TS01-K103A | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 3 GHz | — |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB★ | 8 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB★ | 64 GB |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11.2" | 10.1" |
| Resolution | 3200 px★ | 1280 px |
| Panel | LCD | IPS★ |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | 800 nits★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | — |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Cellular | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓★ | — |
| Fingerprint Reader | ✓★ | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | — |
| OS | HyperOS 2 | Android 15 |
Pros & Cons
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong gpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong storage (89th percentile)89th %ile
CFVOCUY 10.1" TS01-K103A 2026
- Strong cpu (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong gpu (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong social proof (75th percentile)
- Strong ram (66th percentile)
- Below average screen (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
- Below average storage (30th percentile)
- Below average battery (31st percentile)
Pricing
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 20250.135score per dollar
vs
CFVOCUY 10.1" TS01-K103A 20260.253score per dollar
CFVOCUY 10.1" TS01-K103A 2026 offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779
Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.
