Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi
79 Overall Score
vs
Frameflow 11" T7250 Gray

Frameflow 11" T7250 Gray

Frameflow
50 Overall Score

Scores

Entertainment
Xiaomi
82
Frameflow
43
Art Design
Xiaomi
80
Frameflow
35
Reading
Xiaomi
79
Frameflow
46
Productivity
Xiaomi
71
Frameflow
32
Student
Xiaomi
69
Frameflow
42
Business
Xiaomi
62
Frameflow
38

Specifications

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779Frameflow 11" T7250
Processor
CPU3 GHz
Cores88
Memory & Storage
RAM12 GB4 GB
Storage512 GB128 GB
Expandable
Display
Size11.2"11"
Resolution3200 px1280 px
PanelLCDIPS
Refresh Rate144 Hz90 Hz
Brightness800 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4Bluetooth 5.2
USB-C1
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Fingerprint Reader
Face Unlock
Physical
Weight0.45 kg0.55 kg
OSHyperOS 2Android 16

Pros & Cons

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

  • Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong gpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong storage (89th percentile)89th %ile

Frameflow 11" T7250 Gray

  • Strong battery (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong cpu (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong gpu (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average screen (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average ram (31st percentile)

Pricing

Frameflow 11" T7250 Gray is €376 cheaper (2.8x less).

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 20250.135score per dollar
vs
Frameflow 11" T7250 Gray0.246score per dollar

Frameflow 11" T7250 Gray offers 1.8x better value for money

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Frameflow 11" T7250 Gray

Verdict

Winner: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779

Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 19 specs.

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Better at:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Also Consider