Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
98 Overall Score
vs
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R
OM System
56 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Street
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 40 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 150 mm |
| Elements | 20 | 13 |
| Groups | 14 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | 1 |
| Coating | water- and oil-repellent coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.7 | 4-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | APS-C★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.61 kg | 0.19 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | HLA | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 6 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 170 mm★ | 900 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:2★ | 0.16x |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average macro (31st percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.107score per dollar
vs
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R0.226score per dollar
OM System M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R offers 2.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.
