Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
98 Overall Score
vs
Ricoh D FA 28-105MM F3.5-5.6ED DC WR
Ricoh
46 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Street
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Ricoh D FA 28-105MM F3.5-5.6ED DC WR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 105 mm |
| Elements | 20 | — |
| Groups | 14 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 5★ | — |
| Coating | water- and oil-repellent coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | — |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.7 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | — |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.61 kg | 0.50 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | HLA | — |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Stabilization Stops | 6 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 170 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:2★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
Ricoh D FA 28-105MM F3.5-5.6ED DC WR
- Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong aperture (66th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.107score per dollar
vs
Ricoh D FA 28-105MM F3.5-5.6ED DC WR0.065score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 1.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.
