Nikon NIKKOR Z 26mm f/2.8 26mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 26mm f/2.8 26mm

Nikon
56 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Nikon
50
Sigma
100
Landscape
Nikon
57
Sigma
100
Budget
Nikon
61
Sigma
99
Travel
Nikon
61
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Nikon
58
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
59
Sigma
87
Portrait
Nikon
47
Sigma
85
Professional
Nikon
64
Sigma
84
Street
Nikon
67
Sigma
80

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 26mm f/2.8 26mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min26 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max26 mm300 mm
Elements820
Groups614
Aspherical Elements34★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.13 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★HLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification0.19x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 26mm f/2.8 26mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 26mm f/2.8 26mm

No current pricing available

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider