Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Lensbaby Burnside LBB35N 35mm

Lensbaby Burnside LBB35N 35mm

Lensbaby
29 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
Lensbaby
21
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Lensbaby
15
Travel
Nikon
92
Lensbaby
19
Landscape
Nikon
88
Lensbaby
17
Professional
Nikon
83
Lensbaby
23
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Lensbaby
22
Street
Nikon
81
Lensbaby
23
Portrait
Nikon
78
Lensbaby
24
Macro
Nikon
74
Lensbaby
45

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRLensbaby Burnside LBB35N 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min24 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm35 mm
Elements196
Groups154
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal CoatingsMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-6.3f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades78★
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.57 kg0.37 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm152 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Lensbaby Burnside LBB35N 35mm

  • Strong macro (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong build (67th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports