Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
92 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
88 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

82 out of 100 high confidence 117 reviews

The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS lens is widely praised as an excellent all-in-one travel and walkaround lens for APS-C E-mount cameras. Users consistently highlight its sharpness, compact size, light weight, and versatile 27-200mm equivalent zoom range. While many note it is not ideal for low light and some report significant vignetting at the wide end, the overall sentiment is very positive, with most considering it a great value kit lens upgrade.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile 27-200mm equivalent zoom range
  • Effective optical image stabilization
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Significant vignetting at 18mm wide end
  • Not ideal for low light photography
  • Variable aperture limits brightness at telephoto
  • Some copies may have quality control issues
  • Slight autofocus lag compared to premium lenses
👍 Image quality 35
👍 Build quality 12
👍 Value for money 18
👎 Vignetting 6
👎 Low light performance 10
👍 Zoom range 25

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

78 out of 100 high confidence 459 reviews

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and robust build quality. Many users consider it a workhorse for sports, portraits, and low-light photography, though the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback for some. A significant number of reviews highlight the lens's weight and the potential for focus inconsistencies, particularly with moving subjects. Concerns about Canon's support for older models and the tripod collar design also appear in negative feedback.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness and image quality
  • Fast and silent autofocus (USM)
  • Excellent for low-light photography
  • Versatile for sports and portraits
  • Robust build quality
Cons
  • No image stabilization
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Tripod collar design issues
  • Inconsistent autofocus with moving subjects
  • Canon no longer supports repairs
👍 Image quality 35
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👎 Weight and size 18
👎 Image stabilization 15
👍 Value for money 12

Scores

Budget
Sony
96
Canon
94
Portrait
Sony
89
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Sony
82
Canon
95
Professional
Sony
74
Canon
93
Street
Sony
89
Canon
84
Travel
Sony
89
Canon
77
Landscape
Sony
76
Canon
84
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
83
Macro
Sony
68
Canon
69

Specifications

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min18 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm200 mm
Elements1617
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements22
Coating—Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.33 kg★1.07 kg
Filter Thread55 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor★Dual Nano USM
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm★700 mm
Max Magnification0.29x★0.23x

Pros & Cons

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 92 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravel

Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Better at:

PortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo Cinema

Also Consider