Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

Canon
85 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

78 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

This lens is widely praised for its excellent optics, lightweight design, and quiet STM autofocus, making it a great everyday and travel lens. Users note it rivals Canon's L-series in image quality while being much more affordable, though some mention the plastic mount and lack of weather sealing as drawbacks. Verified buyers highlight its sharpness, effective image stabilization, and value for money, especially when purchased as a kit lens. However, a few users report limitations with autofocus points on certain camera bodies and note it is not a true macro lens.

Pros
  • Excellent image quality rivaling L-series
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Quiet and smooth STM autofocus
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Great value for money
Cons
  • Plastic mount instead of metal
  • No weather sealing
  • Limited autofocus points on some bodies
  • Not a true macro lens
  • Inferior image quality to 18-135mm
👍 Image quality 6
🤔 Build quality 4
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Autofocus performance 4
👍 Image stabilization 3
👍 Weight and portability 4

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Budget
Canon
86
Tamron
95
Macro
Canon
89
Tamron
91
Landscape
Canon
70
Tamron
90
Street
Canon
86
Tamron
81
Portrait
Canon
75
Tamron
85
Professional
Canon
69
Tamron
85
Wildlife Sports
Canon
70
Tamron
85
Video Cinema
Canon
75
Tamron
82
Travel
Canon
80
Tamron
81

Specifications

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min18 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm300 mm
Elements1220
Groups1013
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements—2★
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/4
Min Aperture4-5.64-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-SSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.20 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance66 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification1:41:2.8

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm

  • Strong macro (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-55 f/4-5.6 IS STM 18-55mm Better at:

Street

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports