Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

Rokinon AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

Rokinon
48 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Panasonic
99
Rokinon
55
Budget
Panasonic
91
Rokinon
47
Landscape
Panasonic
86
Rokinon
47
Travel
Panasonic
86
Rokinon
38
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Rokinon
50
Street
Panasonic
80
Rokinon
49
Professional
Panasonic
80
Rokinon
58
Portrait
Panasonic
77
Rokinon
42
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Rokinon
51

Specifications

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmRokinon AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm135 mm
Elements1713
Groups1311
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements4★3
CoatingFluorine coatingUltra multicoating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades911★
Build
MountL-MountSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg★0.77 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusLinear STM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★690 mm
Max Magnification0.5x1:4.2★

Pros & Cons

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Rokinon AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports