Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG 200mm

Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG 200mm

Sigma
49 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
40
Sony
100
Street
Sigma
53
Sony
89
Travel
Sigma
26
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
44
Sony
84
Portrait
Sigma
65
Sony
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
48
Sony
83
Professional
Sigma
49
Sony
73
Landscape
Sigma
34
Sony
73
Macro
Sigma
66
Sony
70

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG 200mmSony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min200 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm135 mm
Elements1816
Groups1412
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—2★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperturef/223.5-5.6
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountL-MountSony E
FormatFull-Frame★APS-C
Weight0.54 kg0.33 kg★
Filter Thread72 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusLinear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification1:2★0.29x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 20-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DG 200mm

  • Strong bokeh (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong optical (74th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 19 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports