Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

Sigma
62 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-S85 85mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-S85 85mm

Panasonic
72 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
85
Panasonic
48
Portrait
Sigma
65
Panasonic
79
Video Cinema
Sigma
52
Panasonic
77
Budget
Sigma
62
Panasonic
72
Street
Sigma
62
Panasonic
72
Professional
Sigma
53
Panasonic
71
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
47
Panasonic
55
Travel
Sigma
51
Panasonic
52
Landscape
Sigma
51
Panasonic
49

Specifications

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro AsphericalPanasonic LUMIX S S-S85 85mm
Optics
Typemacroprime
Focal Length Min28 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm85 mm
Elements169
Groups148
Aspherical Elements—0★
ED Elements—2★
CoatingMulti-layer lens coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/1.8
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon EFL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.40 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Linear AF Motor
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance35 mm★800 mm
Max Magnification1:3.8★0.13x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (77th percentile)
  • Strong optical (76th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-S85 85mm

  • Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-S85 85mm

Scores 72 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical Better at:

MacroLandscape

Panasonic LUMIX S S-S85 85mm Better at:

BudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports