Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Nikon
75 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron
97 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.4 35mm

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

Users praise this 35mm f/1.4 lens for its sharpness, character, and value, especially for low-light and portrait work on Nikon Z cameras. While it shows some chromatic aberration and softness wide open, these imperfections are easily corrected in post and add a desirable "3D pop." The build quality is considered adequate, and autofocus speed is satisfactory. Overall, it is highly recommended for those seeking a lens with character rather than clinical perfection.

Pros
  • Sharpness
  • Character and 3D pop
  • Great value for money
  • Excellent for low light
  • Good autofocus speed
Cons
  • Chromatic aberration wide open
  • Softness at f/1.4
  • Not as sharp as S-line lenses
  • Plastic build feel
  • No weather sealing
👍 Sharpness 4
👎 Chromatic aberration 3
👍 Character and rendering 3
👍 Value for money 2
🤔 Build quality 2
👍 Autofocus speed 2

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

85 out of 100 high confidence 62 reviews

The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD lens is widely praised for its sharpness, versatile zoom range, constant aperture, and effective stabilization, making it an excellent all-around lens for APS-C cameras. Users appreciate its solid build quality and value for money, though many note it is noticeably heavier and larger than typical kit lenses, which can feel unbalanced on smaller camera bodies. A few reviewers mention minor issues like chromatic aberration at the longer end and noise from the aperture blades at certain settings, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • sharp image quality across zoom range
  • constant f/2.8 aperture
  • effective image stabilization
  • fast and quiet autofocus
  • versatile 17-70mm focal range
Cons
  • heavy and large for APS-C body
  • chromatic aberration at 50-70mm
  • aperture blade noise above f/5.6
  • short zoom throw initially stiff
  • no aperture ring on Fuji version
👍 Image quality 27
👍 Build quality 15
🤔 Weight and size 18
👍 Value for money 14
👍 Stabilization 12
👍 Autofocus performance 11

Scores

Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Tamron
98
Budget
Nikon
69
Tamron
92
Macro
Nikon
57
Tamron
91
Professional
Nikon
77
Tamron
91
Portrait
Nikon
88
Tamron
91
Travel
Nikon
55
Tamron
87
Landscape
Nikon
61
Tamron
84
Street
Nikon
75
Tamron
78
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
59
Tamron
75

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.4 35mmTamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm70 mm
Elements1116
Groups912
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements22
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave MotorRXD
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance270 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.18x1:4.8★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.4 35mm

  • Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider