Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon
72 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

78 out of 100 high confidence 357 reviews

The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is widely praised as a versatile, sharp, and reliable everyday zoom, with many users calling it their go-to lens for travel, portraits, and general photography. Image stabilization and autofocus are consistently highlighted as excellent, though some note it's not the sharpest L lens and a few report issues like barrel wobble, dust ingress, or soft focus. Mixed experiences with retailer service and repair costs also temper overall enthusiasm.

Pros
  • Versatile zoom range
  • Sharp image quality
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Good build quality
Cons
  • Barrel wobble and rattle
  • Not the sharpest L lens
  • Soft focus at wide angles
  • Dust ingress under glass
  • Plastic build quality
👍 Image quality 45
👍 Versatility 30
👍 Image stabilization 20
👍 Autofocus performance 18
🤔 Build quality 15
👎 Barrel wobble 8

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Landscape
Canon
95
Tamron
90
Macro
Canon
63
Tamron
91
Budget
Canon
78
Tamron
91
Travel
Canon
87
Tamron
84
Portrait
Canon
55
Tamron
87
Professional
Canon
78
Tamron
84
Wildlife Sports
Canon
84
Tamron
84
Street
Canon
65
Tamron
82
Video Cinema
Canon
75
Tamron
80

Specifications

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min24 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max105 mm300 mm
Elements1820
Groups1413
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements12★
CoatingSuper Spectra Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/44-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.70 kg0.59 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSMVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.24x1:2.8★

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (25th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Scores 100 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Better at:

TravelLandscape

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema