Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
80 Overall Score
vs
Sony FE SEL2450G 24-50mm

Sony FE SEL2450G 24-50mm

Sony
74 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Canon
89
Sony
76
Professional
Canon
80
Sony
80
Budget
Canon
80
Sony
78
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Sony
74
Travel
Canon
73
Sony
75
Video Cinema
Canon
75
Sony
68
Street
Canon
64
Sony
71
Macro
Canon
65
Sony
66
Portrait
Canon
54
Sony
56

Specifications

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USMSony FE SEL2450G 24-50mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min15 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm50 mm
Elements1616
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements34
ED Elements22
CoatingAir-Sphere coating, Fluorine coatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.84 kg0.44 kg
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USMLinear motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm180 mm
Max Magnification0.21x0.33x

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Sony FE SEL2450G 24-50mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (77th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Scores 80 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Better at:

BudgetLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sony FE SEL2450G 24-50mm Better at:

StreetTravelPortrait