Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon
80 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 20119 24mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20119 24mm

Nikon
72 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Canon
89
Nikon
67
Professional
Canon
80
Nikon
72
Budget
Canon
80
Nikon
63
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Nikon
57
Macro
Canon
65
Nikon
76
Video Cinema
Canon
75
Nikon
59
Travel
Canon
73
Nikon
67
Street
Canon
64
Nikon
70
Portrait
Canon
54
Nikon
57

Specifications

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USMNikon NIKKOR Z 20119 24mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min15 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm24 mm
Elements169
Groups128
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements22
CoatingAir-Sphere coating, Fluorine coatingNano Crystal Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/11
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.7
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.84 kg0.14 kg
Filter Thread82 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USMAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm119 mm
Max Magnification0.21x1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20119 24mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20119 24mm

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM Better at:

BudgetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20119 24mm Better at:

MacroStreetPortrait

Also Consider