Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 20mm f/2.8 20mm

Viltrox AF 20mm f/2.8 20mm

Viltrox
67 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
42
Viltrox
75
Macro
Sigma
16
Viltrox
74
Street
Sigma
46
Viltrox
74
Travel
Sigma
40
Viltrox
69
Landscape
Sigma
33
Viltrox
69
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Viltrox
66
Budget
Sigma
56
Viltrox
65
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Viltrox
63
Portrait
Sigma
59
Viltrox
54

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSViltrox AF 20mm f/2.8 20mm
Optics
Typewide-angle
Focal Length Min16 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm20 mm
Elements10
Groups8
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
Coatingnano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.16 kg
Filter Thread52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.88

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Viltrox AF 20mm f/2.8 20mm

  • Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Viltrox AF 20mm f/2.8 20mm

Scores 67 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

Portrait

Viltrox AF 20mm f/2.8 20mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports