Zeiss Otus ML 50mm f/1.4 50mm

Zeiss Otus ML 50mm f/1.4 50mm

Zeiss
48 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
86 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Zeiss
56
Canon
91
Video Cinema
Zeiss
45
Canon
82
Budget
Zeiss
48
Canon
79
Landscape
Zeiss
49
Canon
79
Travel
Zeiss
39
Canon
78
Professional
Zeiss
53
Canon
77
Wildlife Sports
Zeiss
35
Canon
75
Street
Zeiss
43
Canon
66
Portrait
Zeiss
45
Canon
49

Specifications

Zeiss Otus ML 50mm f/1.4 50mmCanon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min50 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm70 mm
Elements1415
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements4★2
CoatingZEISS T* Antireflective CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/22
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades10★9
Build
MountNikon FCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.72 kg0.49 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlySTM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm239 mm★
Max Magnification1:7.31:4.2

Pros & Cons

Zeiss Otus ML 50mm f/1.4 50mm

  • Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports