Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon FE14M-FX

Rokinon FE14M-FX

Rokinon
29 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Rokinon
26
Budget
Nikon
85
Rokinon
34
Street
Nikon
84
Rokinon
35
Macro
Nikon
84
Rokinon
14
Portrait
Nikon
84
Rokinon
46
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Rokinon
31
Landscape
Nikon
79
Rokinon
14
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Rokinon
26
Travel
Nikon
70
Rokinon
15

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Rokinon FE14M-FX
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min17 mm14 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm14 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8—
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓★—
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon Z—
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★0.55 kg
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Rokinon FE14M-FX

  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports