Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 50mm f/1.2 50mm

TTArtisan APS-C 50mm f/1.2 50mm

TTArtisan
50 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
TTArtisan
35
Budget
Nikon
85
TTArtisan
45
Street
Nikon
84
TTArtisan
38
Macro
Nikon
84
TTArtisan
37
Portrait
Nikon
84
TTArtisan
38
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
TTArtisan
37
Landscape
Nikon
79
TTArtisan
30
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
TTArtisan
25
Travel
Nikon
70
TTArtisan
33

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8TTArtisan APS-C 50mm f/1.2 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm50 mm
Elements137
Groups115
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-CoatedSonnar Optical Concept
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades910★
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.34 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.5x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

TTArtisan APS-C 50mm f/1.2 50mm

  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong build (71st percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

TTArtisan APS-C 50mm f/1.2 50mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider