Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 17mm f/4 DG DN 17mm

Sigma Contemporary 17mm f/4 DG DN 17mm

Sigma
23 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Sigma
25
Budget
Nikon
85
Sigma
25
Street
Nikon
84
Sigma
33
Macro
Nikon
84
Sigma
12
Portrait
Nikon
84
Sigma
44
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
29
Landscape
Nikon
79
Sigma
11
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Sigma
25
Travel
Nikon
70
Sigma
12

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Contemporary 17mm f/4 DG DN 17mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm17 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.8—
Constant✓★—
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon Z—
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★—
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 17mm f/4 DG DN 17mm

  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports