Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Raynox DCR-250 250mm

Raynox DCR-250 250mm

Raynox
59 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Raynox
43
Macro
Nikon
88
Raynox
73
Budget
Nikon
85
Raynox
53
Street
Nikon
84
Raynox
59
Portrait
Nikon
84
Raynox
53
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Raynox
44
Landscape
Nikon
79
Raynox
31
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Raynox
41
Travel
Nikon
70
Raynox
44

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Raynox DCR-250 250mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm250 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm250 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8—
Min Aperturef/2.8—
Constant✓★—
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF, Canon EF,Nikon F(DX),Sony Alpha
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.06 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★autofocus
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm52 mm★
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Raynox DCR-250 250mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports