Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III

Canon
70 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
61
Macro
Nikon
88
Canon
82
Budget
Nikon
85
Canon
75
Street
Nikon
84
Canon
79
Portrait
Nikon
84
Canon
60
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
66
Landscape
Nikon
79
Canon
68
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
74
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Canon
66

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm55 mm
Elements1311
Groups119
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coatedoptimized coating for digital imaging sensor
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/5.6
Min Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg0.06 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorSTM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★280 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 III Better at:

Travel